A new book says the government
should have focused more on homeowner debt and less on banks. But, what would you expect of a former banker
like former Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner? Sure, the banks were frozen and their balance
sheets needed to be restored so they could loan or the economy would have been
frozen. Even now, the banks have more loan
capacity than they know what to do with.
Even corporations have more cash than they know what to do with. So instead of making productive investments
that would employ people, they buy their own stock making their own managers
richer. And if that were not enough,
capital gains are taxed less than ordinary income that the rest of us
earn. Go figure!
Mian and Sufi
in their book, House of Debt, say they cannot understand why the government
encourages borrowing through tax deductions for mortgage interest
payments. When consumers accumulate debt
loads that can only be sustained with continual price increases, it can endanger
the whole economy when asset deflation finally occurs. “When
there is an activity that is dangerous, you should tax it in one way or
another. And instead we have a system
that actively subsidizes debt.” Go
figure!
Banks enjoyed
the ride and paid nothing for it. Most
were propped up and made whole, even foreign banks. Some were saved by making them consolidate
with weaker banks, making the remainder—too big to fail for sure.
With the salve
of Mr. Geithner’s own book, there is a certain resignation that little more could
have been done. They did not even try.
The bankers complain of the peanuts reserve requirements in the
Financial Reform Act. But, no plausible
reserve requirement can cope with a drop in housing values of more that 25
percent. We are now beholden to a
colossal failure of imagination. Readers
of this blog can imagine better.
No comments:
Post a Comment